Beyond selection: Is ODeL undermining higher education standards in Malawi?


ODeL impact on Malawi's university standards.

The release of the 2025/2026 Public Universities Selection has highlighted a growing shift in Malawi’s higher education system, marked by the rapid expansion of Open, Distance and e-Learning (ODeL) programmes.

ODeL is no longer an alternative in Malawi’s universities. It is becoming a main route into higher education. The latest selection results show how quickly this shift is taking place.

While this shift is often presented as a response to limited university space, emerging enrolment patterns raise a deeper concern about whether the push for access is beginning to outpace the system’s ability to maintain quality.

According to the official 2025/2026 public university selection results released by the Ministry of Education, ODeL enrolment is now matching or, in some cases, exceeding conventional intake in several institutions.

At Mzuzu University (MZUNI), 1,827 students have been selected into face-to-face programmes, compared to 2,550 through ODeL.

The University of Malawi (UNIMA) shows a near equal split, with 2,941 students in conventional programmes and 2,950 under ODeL.

At the Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (MUBAS), 920 students have been admitted under ODeL, while the Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR) has enrolled 1,130 ODeL students against 1,702 in conventional programmes.

At MZUNI alone, ODeL enrolment exceeds face-to-face intake by more than 700 students. This reflects a system increasingly leaning on alternative delivery modes.

The figures point to a system under pressure. Universities are expanding intake through alternative modes largely because physical infrastructure cannot keep pace with rising demand.

Government and public universities defend the approach, saying it aligns with national development priorities, including Malawi 2063 and the National Education Sector Investment Plan, both of which emphasise expanding access to higher education.

There is merit in that argument.

ODeL provides flexibility and opens doors for students who would otherwise be locked out of university education.But the scale of expansion raises legitimate concerns.

Large enrolments often run into hundreds per programme. This overstretches lecturers and limits meaningful academic engagement.

Conventional learning offers structured and consistent interaction. ODeL relies on limited contact sessions and student self-direction.

This raises a critical question: can the system guarantee the same level of academic rigour under such conditions?

Equally concerning is the issue of student placement. Many candidates who apply for specific programmes are being redirected to ODeL, in some cases into courses they did not prioritise.

Selection is guided by merit and subject requirements.

However, this outcome can undermine student motivation and career alignment.

The result is a cohort of students who enter university not fully by choice, but by circumstance.

At the same time, the growing reliance on self-sponsored, non-residential ODeL programmes raises broader questions about sustainability and the direction of public higher education.

This is not to dismiss ODeL. When properly structured and supported, it remains a valuable tool for expanding access.

However, expansion without proportional investment in academic staff, digital infrastructure and quality assurance systems may weaken the very foundation universities are meant to uphold.

Malawi’s higher education sector faces a clear dilemma: how to widen access without diluting standards.

If the current trend continues, the country risks producing more graduates, but with uncertain quality and levels of preparedness.

Access alone is not enough. It must be matched with quality, relevance, and student-centred placement.

Otherwise, efforts to expand access may ultimately weaken the value of the education students receive.Getting students into university is no longer the main challenge.

The real issue is ensuring the value of what they receive once admitted.Without that balance, expansion may produce more graduates, but fewer who are truly prepared.

Discover more from Malawi24

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading