The Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) has rejected a formal request from political parties seeking an audit of the country’s Electoral Management System (EMS), citing concerns over system integrity and institutional control.
In a three-page letter addressed to political parties, MEC Chairperson Justice Annabel Mtalimanja clarified the commission’s position, stating that the proposed audit deviated significantly from standard ICT assurance protocols.
“The submitted scope resembles a structured forensic investigation rather than a professional ICT assurance exercise,” wrote Justice Mtalimanja. “Such a process risks compromising system security, undermining institutional control, and weakening the Commission’s ability to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.”
The EMS, a critical component in managing Malawi’s electoral cycle, is responsible for voter registration, results transmission, and data management. Political parties have been pushing for an independent review of the system ahead of the 2025 general elections, citing concerns over transparency and potential vulnerabilities.
However, the MEC insists there is no evidence to warrant an audit, emphasising that the scope submitted by the parties does not indicate any irregularities within the system.
“The scope does not point to any irregularities,” Mtalimanja stressed, further explaining that the Commission had conducted its internal assessments and maintains confidence in the robustness of the EMS infrastructure.
The rejection has already sparked reactions among political stakeholders. Some opposition figures have criticised the MEC’s stance, accusing the commission of lacking transparency and accountability, especially at a time when public confidence in democratic institutions remains fragile.
Meanwhile, electoral observers and civil society organisations are calling for dialogue and a possible review of the audit scope to ensure it aligns with acceptable ICT assurance standards while addressing the legitimate concerns raised by political players.
As the 2025 elections approach, pressure on the MEC to assure all stakeholders of a credible and fair process continues to mount. Whether this latest standoff will lead to further confrontation or compromise remains to be seen.
