Chilima and Chakwera on a fishing expedition: resort to more absurd propaganda against MEC

The desperation in MCP/UTM camp to find evidence to support their petition in the elections case is reaching a breaking point.

The latest of their stunts is to leak a K4 billion cheque from Treasury to a MEC current account named Chief Elections Officer – yet another propaganda that collapses in the face of truth.

Lazarus Chakwera and Saulos Chilima filed the petition in court last month challenging the Presidential results of the May 21 elections.

However, to-date, they have struggled to find evidence to prove their case. They have piled before themselves tons of documents hoping to find the evidence in that haystack.

The leakage of the cheque is one of their propaganda to justify their case. However, this also fails miserably, as Chilima and Chakwera have deliberately put aside facts on the cheque.

Facts of the Matter

In their propaganda, they have maligned MEC Chief Elections Officer Sammie Alufandika as the recipient of the money.

In directly attacking Alfandika, they hope to justify their allegation that MEC officials were bribed to falsify figures of the elections in favour of President Peter Mutharika.

However, the facts of the matter are that the said account is not a personal account. It does not belong to Alufandika. It belongs to the office of the Chief Elections Officer.

It is an institutional account which has existed even prior to the previous elections in 2014. There are also institutional signatories to the account. It was opened legitimately, and for legitimate purposes.

How the account came about

Due to delays in government financial transactions, MEC was bearing the consequences due to the time-bound nature of some of its activities. Therefore, MEC pleaded with the Government in 2013 to assist the elections body so that it does not suffer delays in clearance of Treasury cheques.

Government then resolved and authorised MEC to open an account in the name of an office, hence the Chief Elections Officer.

Government releases the funds through IFMIS and through Regional Treasury Cashier. MEC then processes the funds to be deposited into that account.

The activities through this account are auditable – just as it happens with all other accounts.

Psychological coercion

Chilima and Chakwera are aware of this legitimate process. However, they have deliberately avoided it knowing that it backfires on their strategy to try their case in the public court.

They filed their petition while they did not have evidence to prove their case. That is why they have kept amending their documents in court. They have also kept asking those who have evidence to bring it forth.

Through their lawyers, they have been demanding information from every stakeholder in the elections.

The leakage of the K4 billion cheque is one of their tactics on psychological coercion of the five judges that are hearing the case.

It is another of their strategies to create an extra-judicial and illegal system where the case is tried through mob justice instead of the court system.

In their bid, they have attacked the judges themselves claiming three of them have been bribed. They have been hustling them whenever they have been going to court such that they now go to court under military escort.

Chakwera and Chilima have also attacked MEC chair Justice Jane Ansah and all MEC Commissioners and staff, UNDP and all other stakeholders.

They have also been mobilizing people to maim and kill other Malawians and steal and destroy private and public property.

However, pressure is now mounting on them. Chakwera, Chilima and their CSO individuals have come under fire from Catholic Bishops and Malawians for organising violent demonstrations related to their election case. They are accused of conspiracy to usurp court duties and undermine constitutional means on dispute settlement.

Transparent election

Their pursuit is even made worse by the fact that all international observers and local election bodies highly-rated the elections as transparent and credible.

The African Union, European Union Election Observer Mission and SADC hailed the election as well-organized, credible, free and fair.

As part of the transparency initiatives, Malawi Electoral Support Network, NICE Trust and all political parties were allowed to run independent tally centres. Both MESN and NICE independently found that Mutharika had won the election.

Advertisement

6 Comments

  1. It’s disappointing with that kind of reasoning in malawian opposition. Honestly how did you expect to win when you shared votes? Stop that madness and go back to the drawing board.stop wasting your time nothing will change dpp is in power don’t fool yourselves mutichititsa manyazi. And why should church not involved? Just swallow it you lost period.

  2. I do not really understand the job description of human Rights defenders. Is it to demonstrate against Govrnment all the time or to defend the rights of all citizens. please educate me.

  3. Don’t write things to pull out people’s mind concerning the election issue. The court is there to produce justice . Malawians aree tired of current DPP ruling.

  4. Chilima and chakwela if they want Malawian’s to vote for them in 2024 they must stop there nonsense and start building up for the future.coz what I see is that this people they were so confident of wining election but unfortunately this power hungry they didn’t and now they are at best to destroy peace of Malawian’s

  5. The church their not suppose to gate involve of this matter

Comments are closed.